ABO incompatibility may reduce virus transmissibility by 60% or more

Share Button

Several independent datasets suggest blood type A is over-represented and type O under24 represented among COVID-19 patients. Here, I model a scenario in which ABO transfusion incompatibility reduces the chance of a patient transmitting the virus to an incompatible recipient. Comparison of model outputs to published data on COVID-19 prevalence indicates that if this scenario holds true, ABO incompatibility may reduce virus transmissibility by 60% or more. Paradoxically, however, targeted vaccination of either high-susceptibility type A or “super spreader” type O individuals is less effective than random vaccination at blocking community spread of the virus. Instead, the key is to maintain blood type diversity amongst the remaining susceptible individuals. I stress that these results illustrate a theoretical model of ABO blood group interaction with virus transmission and require confirmation by observation.

Access the PDF file:

Modelling suggests blood group incompatibility may substantially reduce SARS-CoV-2 transmission

Several recent published studies and preprints have suggested that the prevalence of COVID39 19 disease varies by blood type, with type A being relatively susceptible and type O being less susceptible. Puzzlingly, however, there is no difference in the severity of disease, with the case fatality ratio (CFR) and the probability of progressing to intensive care appearing independent of blood type. This discrepancy between incidence and severity data has led some authors to challenge the aforementioned findings. Although not remarked on to date, in the majority of these studies type AB appears even more susceptible than type A. Thus, the relative risk of infection is AB > A > B > O, with type A and type B alleles functioning codominantly to increase risk. This is immediately reminiscent of the rules governing blood transfusion compatibility.

Share Button

52 Comments

  1. Robin November 14, 2020 Reply
  2. Ken November 16, 2020 Reply
  3. Ken November 16, 2020 Reply
      • Ken November 17, 2020 Reply
        • Robin December 5, 2020 Reply
          • Ken December 5, 2020 Reply
      • Robin November 22, 2020 Reply
    • Robin December 9, 2020 Reply
  4. Ken November 17, 2020 Reply
    • Robin December 5, 2020 Reply
      • Ken December 5, 2020 Reply
        • Robin December 5, 2020 Reply
          • Ken December 5, 2020 Reply
  5. Ken November 18, 2020 Reply
    • Robin November 20, 2020 Reply
  6. Ken November 20, 2020 Reply
    • Robin November 22, 2020 Reply
    • Ken December 9, 2020 Reply
      • Robin December 9, 2020 Reply
      • Robin December 10, 2020 Reply
      • Ken December 11, 2020 Reply
    • Robin December 9, 2020 Reply
  7. Ken November 21, 2020 Reply
    • Robin November 22, 2020 Reply
    • Lashleigh November 24, 2020 Reply
      • Ken November 25, 2020 Reply
  8. Robin November 22, 2020 Reply
  9. Robin November 22, 2020 Reply
  10. Robin November 22, 2020 Reply
  11. Ken November 22, 2020 Reply
    • Robin November 23, 2020 Reply
  12. Robin November 26, 2020 Reply
  13. Ken November 28, 2020 Reply
  14. Lashleigh November 29, 2020 Reply
  15. Ken December 2, 2020 Reply
  16. Robin December 5, 2020 Reply
    • Ken December 5, 2020 Reply
    • Ken December 6, 2020 Reply
    • Ken December 8, 2020 Reply
      • Mike DammannAuthor December 8, 2020 Reply
        • Robin December 9, 2020 Reply
          • Mike DammannAuthor January 29, 2021 Reply
        • Robin December 9, 2020 Reply
  17. Ken December 8, 2020 Reply
  18. zaina January 12, 2021 Reply
    • Ken January 13, 2021 Reply
      • Robin January 14, 2021 Reply
        • Ken January 14, 2021 Reply
          • Robin January 15, 2021 Reply

Add a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.