INFJs are the rarest type, and make up about 1–3% of the general population. INFJ (Introversion, Intuition, Feeling, Judging) is an initialism used in the publications of the Myers–Briggs Type Indicator (MBTI) to refer to one of the sixteen personality types. The MBTI assessment was developed from the work of prominent psychiatrist Carl Jung in his book Psychological Types. Jung proposed a psychologicaltypology based on the theories of cognitive functions that he developed through his clinical observations.
According to previously questioning you, INFJ was very high among rhesus negatives. ENFJ was a close second.
English
Afrikaans
Albanian
Amharic
Arabic
Armenian
Azerbaijani
Basque
Belarusian
Bengali
Bosnian
Bulgarian
Catalan
Cebuano
Chichewa
Chinese (Simplified)
Chinese (Traditional)
Corsican
Croatian
Czech
Danish
Dutch
Esperanto
Estonian
Filipino
Finnish
French
Frisian
Galician
Georgian
German
Greek
Gujarati
Haitian Creole
Hausa
Hawaiian
Hebrew
Hindi
Hmong
Hungarian
Icelandic
Igbo
Indonesian
Irish
Italian
Japanese
Javanese
Kannada
Kazakh
Khmer
Korean
Kurdish (Kurmanji)
Kyrgyz
Lao
Latin
Latvian
Lithuanian
Luxembourgish
Macedonian
Malagasy
Malay
Malayalam
Maltese
Maori
Marathi
Mongolian
Myanmar (Burmese)
Nepali
Norwegian
Pashto
Persian
Polish
Portuguese
Punjabi
Romanian
Russian
Samoan
Scottish Gaelic
Serbian
Sesotho
Shona
Sindhi
Sinhala
Slovak
Slovenian
Somali
Spanish
Sudanese
Swahili
Swedish
Tajik
Tamil
Telugu
Thai
Turkish
Ukrainian
Urdu
Uzbek
Vietnamese
Welsh
Xhosa
Yiddish
Yoruba
Zulu
I took that test and I’m indeed INFJ! WOW!
As far as I remember, I am this one: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/INTJ
I took the test and it shows that I am a ENFJ…Like the INFJ’s, I am also gentle, caring, complex and highly intuitive, artistic and creative, and live in a world of hidden meanings and possibilities…I have read the description of both and I feel that both the ENFJ and INFJ describe me too….I am Rh 0 Negative
No, I don’t think the M-B assessment is broad spectrum. One can be an empath, but not introvert, perceiver, or a navigator. I’m not seeing the correlation with metrics developed by positives. the basic assumptions are different. woo woo, they are “introverted:” as if this is a bad thing. so what? the things I value like honesty or intuition, are not valued or even assessed. the important factors are not on the screen, just like everything else is not on the screen, or is judged as suspicious. can’t fix a broken paradigm with the same components. so, whatever their system might be, it was developed using their baseline assumptions and preconceived notions on how things work, when I disagree that those assumptions are accurate.
I did those tests 40 years ago, and they said “(and this is actual response)…huh…wow…wow man…you don’t fit into these categories very well. you seem introverted but you are a radical activist. huh…you seem quiet, but you communicate exceptionally, with those you understand. , huh, look look look! you score low on this part, but, look, you are very outgoing at the same time. huh.. you have no fear, but yet, you don’t interact (they assume you are scared or introverted), huh…look look, you don’t add up. oh, no! you don’t fit in!!!!! help help, what do we do now?
The post is not about whether or not the test is “accurate”, but about the curiosity of high frequencies of a rare type among rhesus negative women.
I agree with your response Mike Dammann!
to prove my point, just click on the clickbait for the IQ test. a bunch of stupid questions, I scored 100% on questions deemed ,important but are just obvious. but surprise, you have to PAY to get your result, AFTER doing this little quiz, another clickbait bullshit piec ye of scam that we all detest, thanks matt. get rid of this garbage , to prove what you are about. thank you.
but the point is, these questions are developed by idiots, without the IQ to even develop a test to test for it. they have no conception of what “high IQ” means. I think the entire “test” was boring and could be done in Grade 5. maybe that’s the idea.
sorry mike, I said” matt” , wasn’t paying attention
I think this IQ test is a great case in point. someone thought up these stupid questions that anyone could answer by looking at them. it reflects on the difference in paradigms, wow man, look , they can spot a pattern. wow. how about, look man, we are different, that doesn’t mean smarter, just looking at things differently, that doesn’t mean wrong, but some things are just obvious, like , example, there may be 20 ways to fix a problem, and 18 of them will work, so how do you measure which one is better?
I am INFJ-T. I did the test then read the profile. It did sound like me.
AB- female INTJ here.
I am INFJ…O negetive female.
I’m 0- INFJ Aspergers
I’m a Infj-T, Blood type O positive.
I’m unusual I guess because I am I (sometimes E) NFP. More perceiving than judging. I wonder how and why that is different. Also have A- , 14% Ashkenazi Jew, otherwise a mutt – mixture of Irish, English/NW Europe, Scottish, Germanic Europe, French, and Norwegian.