Is this true?
See the update here:
The rumor that rhesus negative people are somehow immune to HIV/AIDS will not die down. Even though it has been proven that this is not the case. There might be indication that rhesus negative people are less likely to contract the HIV virus, but claiming that “O negative people cannot get it” is plain and simply false.
Continue here: Despite the rumors, rhesus negative people CAN get AIDS
Is it true that rh negative people cannot get HIV/AIDS?
Or rather that O negative people cannot contract the virus?
I was hoping to find a study with a substantial amount of subjects and not one rh or O negative patients amongst them, but that didn’t happen.
Here are some studies I have found:
The Role of Red Blood Cells in Enhancing or Preventing HIV Infection and Other Diseases
HIV infection has been reported to occur in select blood groups in some regions of the world. A study by Sayal et al. in India reported a preponderance for infection in group O Rh(D)-positive men and least among groups B positive and D-negative ones.
In a separate study, Abdulazeez and colleagues working with HIV-1 and -2 reported a higher prevalence of HIV-2 (71.4%) compared to HIV-1 (7.1%) in the AB blood group and that Rh(D) positive (97.8%) was more susceptible than D negative (2.2%).
Blood Group Phenotypes and HIV Infection Rates
The incidence of HIV infection among the secretors was further stratified based on ABO blood groups. The incidence of HIV infection was the highest among blood group A secretors and when compared to blood group O, this difference was significant (p = 0.028; OR, 1.556; 95% CI, 1.061–2.280), blood group B, of modest significance (p = 0.066; OR, 1.625; 95% CI, 0.944–2.799) and blood group AB, not significant (p = 0.355; OR, 1.5; 95% CI, 0.573–3.930).
Source: Mucosal Blood Group Antigen Expression Profiles and HIV Infections
Some people are genetically at greater risk of HIV infection than others.
The first genetic mutation associated with HIV susceptibility was identified in the mid-1990s. Known as the CCR5-Delta32 mutation, it seems to confer strong resistance to infection by HIV. This gene mutation is found most commonly in certain European populations.
They found that the cells of people who express high levels of Pk, a rare group representing about one in a million people, were resistant to HIV infection. Conversely, the cells of those who express no Pk at all, representing about five in a million people, were particularly susceptible to HIV infection.
Source: The human Pk histo-blood group antigen provides protection against HIV-1 infection
In conclusion:
The role of ABO blood groups in infectious and non infectious diseases is well established. Much scientific evidence also exists to support the role of erythrocytes in binding viruses and facilitating infection of permissive cells. Some blood groups such as the Duffy type are implicated as candidate molecules. Other molecules such as the Pk blood group which are present in Caucasian populations have been shown to confer resistance to HIV infection. The study of blood groups in HIV infection may shed light on the dynamics of HIV epidemiology, especially in hard-hit SubSaharan Africa.
Finally, HIV continues to take a toll on the health and economies of the world especially the developing countries. To date a cure for this virus continues to be elusive. However, a virtually complete remission has been attained in one patient following a bone marrow transplant of a CCR5Δ32/Δ32 mutant cell line. However, despite this milestone, donors with this mutation are still far too rare and limited to European populations. Very few studies have focused on the role of blood groups in preventing or enhancing HIV infection, and these few had the limited scope of only looking at the ABH and Rh(D) blood groups.
Rh negative people may be less likely to get HIV/AIDS. But we are far from immune.
So be careful and don´t assume that you are protected by your blood type regardless what it is!
.
To get sick with HIV AIDS requires two things
1) HIV
2) Unknown Factor
HIV only means you will be health. Even the french researcher who is one of the scientist who discovered AIDS admitted that HIV alone won’t cause the disease. There is an unknown factor.
HIV + unknown Factor means you will get sick
AIDS in Africa originated from small pox vaccine in 1970s. Many statistics in Africa were later artificially inflated.
AIDS in the US originated from hepatitis B vaccine in 1978. Ground zero was the New York City blood center. As they spread out their vaccines, AIDS spread in the US. Children they gave it to in Alaska in 1986, came down with a type of sarcoma.
Some people who were diagnosed with HIV would have stayed healthy if they didn’t use toxic treatments. Treatments killed people too.
We could investigate the Africa case by looking at the vaccination records but Belgium said that 2 million records were “lost”
We could investigate the US case by looking at the vaccination records but the government said there is a privacy issue … yeah right
We could investigate the vaccines used to make over 500 thousand Gulf War Illness cases but the Pentagon said the records were “lost”
For any researcher who exposes the lies, their research funding will likely get cut. Scientists are on a leash. Also understand that scientific evidence are all anecdotal reports. You have to do your own due diligence and read between the lines of this research.
There are so many official lies connected with AIDS HIV.
The number one thing you can do is stay away from vaccines. They are toxic to your health.
Remember that HIV alone will not make you sick.
The degree of communicable of AIDS is murky subject for me
If you get sick, use natural medicines. Be aware of the toxic food and water supply so eat healthy
This is interesting and thank you for posting. I agree that no one should believe they can’t get HIV. I’m O blood type, RH Negative. Both parents are also RH Negative. My first husband was Gay and contracted HIV and died of AIDS in 1989. He was sick before the drugs they have today were created. Fortunately I was Negative for the virus. I don’t want to reveal too much personal info and reveal others privacy but I have another relative Gay whose partner died of AIDS in 1998. Relative is healthy. I believe there might be a resistance but definitely would be foolish to believe you can’t contract the virus.
Interesting. I knew somebody intimately who died of cancer but had hiv. The reason why he never passed the virus onto me was not because I’m RH Negative, but because I insisted on condoms. At the time we were unaware of his status. I did have a sixth sense or shall we call it common sense, I was aware of his roving eye and love of any willing female.
I do believe I have a guardian angel. I took apple cider vinegar regularly for years, and still do, for a leg injury due to a car accident. Apple cider vinegar acts well against viruses. I’ve also used aloe gel for years, direct from the plant. I have over 100 aloe plants. Aloe heals many sicknesses.
Its simple. Higher ph balance. Higher acidic content and alkaline without an extra protein. Not the easiest path for a virus. And “magic or science” takes the path of least resistance. So its gonna get the major population before us.
I am always acidic. So much do real gold turns me green.
Roaches. Spiders fleas ticks and lice bugs known in less hygenic places including nasty mice and other wild shit will gather where a virus enjoys its environment.
They dont gather in orange trees but palmettos will go for shit holes. Acids are repellent to most “dirty bugs”. Lemons limes and moonshine cleaners as well as essential oils and cleaner environments that produce good bacteria is natures way of saying wtf you nasty butts clean up this mess. Again it is not just physical but spiritual. People who have psycho sexual issues tend to have more STDs. As an example.
A citrus oil directly on skin can and will burn like fire. But not destroy its surface its on. The plants are your freinds. Monkeys eating their own shit are not.
I had never heard that about being Rh negative… BUT there is a type of genetic mutation (called the CCR5-Δ32 mutation) that is supposed to be protective of HIV infection (especially if you have two alleles with the mutation)… because there is a specific receptor which HIV need to attach to in order infect a person. This specific mutation is also thought to be related to why certain people did not get smallpox or plague.
The reason I know about this is that I had multiple (at least 12) smallpox vaccinations as a child but never developed a “vaccination scar” so every year I had to go get yet another shot. Also all 4 of my brothers I believe had the same thing… so I was researching why and came across the literature on that mutation. A fairly simple explanation is provided in the Wikipedia post below:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CCR5#CCR5-%CE%9432
… there are also some downsides of having that specific mutation and one of them is more likely to get certain cancers.