I’m not sure where the line is, so I am tired of drawing it.
Just because a comment is approved doesn’t mean I agree with it or like it.
My point is this:
If there is something you are disagreeing with, state your case.
This blog is about Rh negative blood and people, but most of all FOR Rh negative people.
So here is my question to you:
Is civilization without censorship a possibility?
If everything is allowed, will it not be inevitable for group to form independently and then censoring the rest?
I will do my best to keep this blog 100% censorship free, but it takes your help to make it happen.
If you see a comment you’re disagreeing with, do your part to state your case.
Then and only then can we all enjoy a community where no one side dominates and all Rh negatives coming here will be best served.
I am A neg and a libertarian, mostly, so I think, YES! Civilization without censorship is absolutely possible. There are many beliefs and ideas that I do not agree with but that does not mean I have the right to impose myself on others. I believe as long as you are not physically, verbally, or mentally abusing someone else, or property that does not belong to you, then for the most part you should be left alone to do your thing. Some will say that they feel attacked by someone saying something but if you have the ability to leave the conversation, walk out of the room, close the page, turn the channel, then it is on you. I believe when you start censoring then you are not necessarily protecting anyone, instead you may be pushing an agenda or hiding truth. When that occurs, when it is seen to be happening by the people you are censoring, then it causes the people to question everything they have ever been told. I think you should always question, but you should also be able to trust certain sources and I personally do not at the moment. The censorship that is taking place right now is unreal.