The latest calculations highlight a huge drop within the last few years as nations with low percentage of rh negatives tend to expand their population at a much higher rate than those with higher percentages where in many cases the populations actually tend to drop.
See what’s new:
Mike: I have done some spreadsheet calculations based upon the data (by country) that you have posted.
A worldwide percentage of approx 6% Rh Neg and 94% Rh Pos emerged. The total population that you gave of 6,416,019,550 is approx 82% of the current global population (using the number of 7,785,626,3400.
Mongolia is the highest at 99.96% (Rh Pos) and Poland the lowest (Rh Pos) (or highest Rh. Neg) at 80.34%.
I concur with and support your earlier observation that the breakdowns within countries by ABO type are very revealing.
I am just doing some quick calculations to get a sense of where the anomalies lie in the global distributions. The region around North East India stands out as well as parts of Latin America.
I’m curious as I mentioned in prior post huge rh neg population in North Carolina coast. Wilmington. I’m curious as to why in one town? Is there a way to find a percentage through American blood donation facilities. It was strange. So if mother negative father positive babies most likely positive blood. Right? More dating websights… Does anyone educate children on childbirth hazards if girls rh negative? Like I mentioned I wish I had known. I do think we are attracted to each other more. Survival? Just a thought… Tomorrow full day of osha, New world for my type of work…It’s interesting …