The origin of rh negative blood is still unknown.
There are a few things we do, however, know for certain:
- Rh(D) negative blood is the result of a gene deletion.
- Blood type frequencies in ancient Europe were far different from today.
The gene deletion may have first taken place among the ancestors to the Yamnaya. Red hair among humans is known to originate among them as well and blue eyes are likely to have had originated there.
The function of the Rh proteins is oxygen and CO2 transport, so the reason our mutation has survived may mean that the conditions for us were ideal.
Today’s health issues among Rh(D) negative individuals likely indicate a drastic change in living conditions. Toxins present in air, food and medicine can affect us greatly. This doesn’t make us “sick people”, but rather healthy people reacting healthiest to sickening conditions.
Much is still unknown about us, but this much is clear:
We are different.
We are not aliens or beings not from this earth.
We are connected to the conditions once enjoyed by our ancestry.
The world that we are now a part of is very different and we feel it more than others.
Hi Mike, I’m reading this. I’m B negative, during investigation on origin of RH negative blood types, I mentioned that people with lower body temperatures (RH neg blood types state lower temps around 97.2-97.7 verses The norm 98.6. This indicates that possible origin is Northern. Eskimos have average body temperatures as low as 66 degrees to accommodate arctic climates. The further north you go the lower oxygen. What’s so interesting about this article mike is that I’ve confounded pulmonologists and stress test cardiologists over the years. I can go from zero to 7 mile run without losing my breath. I have smoked cigarette for 40 yrs. There mouths hung open during last stress test. They state you excel over people who don’t smoke. They attributed this to higher hemoglobin levels, I think your article explains this anomaly better. Maybe we RH negatives adapt best in colder climates. Need less O2?
I may have misread article yet my statement true for me at least.
Biblically we can learn that life is the soul and not the flesh. The soul shapes the physical body and then uses it in a physical world. If God would withdraw his lifegiving spirit everything would no longer be in a physical firm matter but desolve into atoms (I suppose). When we look at the Planet we know that all firm land, all continents have been one area of dry land- Pangea. And I believe the survivors of the flood during Noahs time- last flood/iceage? spread before Pangea was divided. I wonder if not the science haplop groups may show this. Though they exclude the spirit world and thus can never explain anything truthfully I think and since soul power, spirits are not included I alos fear the C 14 test to be nonaccurate. Every soul must be radioactive of sorts- hold a Geiger m against a living and it makes a lot of noice. So anything organic might be housing a lot of spirits, souls, demons or amlost none- it might make a difference in the isotop they look into. According to the Bible some angels started to mingle with humans and humans have become blinded, comprehensivly blinded, locked senses along the way. Christianity helps with opening up our senses, giving us intelligence and when a Christian is reborn in our souls we can see the souls, angels in Heaven. And hear communication in spirit/thought we can read. I wonder also if this- more intelligence and something actually making humans less intelligent may have to do with the Cro magnon who had 1/3 larger brain, blue, green or hazel eyes compared with the Homo Sapien with less brain and all sorts of eye colour etc. Maybe the H Sapiens are the Rh + bloodtypes- been made blinded by unclean souls that has ape in them. A mix of humans ouls and apesouls since human and ape would never breed. The question: If Rh- is true and clean Gods humans and Rh- women miscarry if not injected – well if the child has Rh+ blood that is- how has any Rh+ women been born then? Well, take the Biblical Jakob and Esau twins – I think they where identical but Esau got possessed by an unclean soul since he was redhaired and fury (orangutang soul in it I think)- their mother Rebecka was most likely Rh- like many Biblical women with trouble getting pregnant. She did not miscarry since Jakob was not possessed. And had they been women instead of men then one twin girl was Rh- and the other a possessed Rh+ girl- there would be no miscarrying since one was a negative child. There are questions to ask- important since if Rh- is the true and clean human – we might be extinct rather soon. WW1 and WW2 might have killed a lot of Rh- men… and anti-d injections might prevent Rh- births and force negative women to give birth to possessed children?
//God Bless Ann-sofie Forsman