What is the origin of rh negative blood?
Many rh negatives feel like we are completely different from rh positives. Almost a different species. It leads to theories relating to “aliens”, “Atlantis” and even further out there claims related to newer inventions such as “starseeds”, “Paleidians”, “Reptilians” and the list goes on and on.
In other words: New fabrications keep on coming.
It seems to give some people comfort. Many of us are highly intuitive and while it is difficult to “fit in”, we are great at faking it if we have to.
Many rh negatives have told me how they need to fake being interested in things and people and also fake respect for those in higher positions. In other words: Being ourselves is not always easy in today’s society. Which makes it even more important to ask:
Which is OUR society?
Was there ever one that was 100% rh negative?
And if so: What was life like?
In order to get closer to this answer, we need to look for the common denominators among the groups with the highest percentages of rh negative people.
The Yamna people are responsible for the R1b in today’s Celts. They were said to be around 40% rh negative.
The R1b was brought to the Pyrenees when Proto-Celts invaded the Proto-Basques and replaced their male line. The original Basques were y-DNA I2a and G2a, likely coming from the Caucasus region where to the day the highest frequencies are present. When it comes to the mtDNA frequencies, J and K stand out. In the Proto-Basques that is as in the original Basques.
But first of all, let’s look at an ancient map of the region:
It looks like this today:
Several migrations took place over the millennia.
Basically, the Yamna people became the Celts in the west and the Scythians towards the east.
The Basques arrived in Europe long before the Yamna culture, but were later invaded by them.
40% of Steppe-ancestry individuals would have been Rh-, compared to around 24% of hunter-gatherers, 4% of early farmers, and about 16% of present-day Europeans.
These early farmers could have easily been responsible for the lower rh negative frequencies today.
Traditionally the Proto-Indo-European society is considered to have been primarily patrilineal and patriarchal. However, excavations at Yamna kurgans reveal that approximately 20% of the remains are female, which appear to have lived and died similarly to their male counterparts.
Is this warrior spirit something typical in rh negative women? Is sharing rights and responsibilities a common trait in rh negative partnerships?
After years of observations, I cannot help but notice the similarities between the ones observed today and the tribes said high in rh negatives’ behaviors.
I don’t see too much “male ego” in rh negative men and from what I have observed, rh negative men and women are very much in tune with each others. Not the “war of the sexes” as we see developing all over the world. As we are used to life not making much sense, it could have made a ton of sense in societies run by rh negatives. A more natural way of just being. It would explain why so many of us feel out of place all too often. And it is part of why I have been passionate regarding rh negative origins.
Do you ever wonder why so many men are intimidated by strong women? I can almost guarantee you that rh negative men are not. As a matter of fact, we may be more drawn to women who are strong, have their own ideas and are not afraid to use what they have.
Whatever characteristic behavior in men and women is fashionable in society, likely goes against our nature.
Teamwork is about respect, not ego.
The Basque people are said to be a mix of hunter-gatherers as well as early farmers. But something is missing here. If you are referring to a group that is 1/3rd rh negative yet results from group 24% and 4% rh negatives, something isn’t right.
Whoever that group was that came to the Pyrenees 3-4,000 years before the Celts, has likely never once been properly analysed.
Related articles and studies include:
The origin of the Celts
Why have rh negative frequencies gone down since Bronze age?
A plausible model for the formation of the Yamnaya genotype
Female exogamy and gene pool diversification at the transition from the Final Neolithic to the Early Bronze Age in central Europe
A plausible model for the formation of the Yamnaya genotype